↓ Skip to main content

Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts
Published in
Cell Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrien Senecal, Brian Munsky, Florence Proux, Nathalie Ly, Floriane E. Braye, Christophe Zimmer, Florian Mueller, Xavier Darzacq

Abstract

Transcription is a stochastic process occurring mostly in episodic bursts. Although the local chromatin environment is known to influence the bursting behavior on long timescales, the impact of transcription factors (TFs)--especially in rapidly inducible systems--is largely unknown. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization and computational models, we quantified the transcriptional activity of the proto-oncogene c-Fos with single mRNA accuracy at individual endogenous alleles. We showed that, during MAPK induction, the TF concentration modulates the burst frequency of c-Fos, whereas other bursting parameters remain mostly unchanged. By using synthetic TFs with TALE DNA-binding domains, we systematically altered different aspects of these bursts. Specifically, we linked the polymerase initiation frequency to the strength of the transactivation domain and the burst duration to the TF lifetime on the promoter. Our results show how TFs and promoter binding domains collectively act to regulate different bursting parameters, offering a vast, evolutionarily tunable regulatory range for individual genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 251 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 26%
Researcher 58 22%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 37 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 29%
Physics and Astronomy 19 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#9,015
of 12,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,841
of 242,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#98
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.