You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced hamstring strength increases anterior cruciate ligament loading during anticipated sidestep cutting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Biomechanics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.05.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua T. Weinhandl, Jennifer E. Earl-Boehm, Kyle T. Ebersole, Wendy E. Huddleston, Brian S.R. Armstrong, Kristian M. O'Connor |
| Abstract |
Dynamic knee stability is considered a critical factor in reducing anterior cruciate ligament loads. While the relationships between hamstring force production and anterior cruciate ligament loading are well known in vitro, the influence of hamstring strength to anterior cruciate ligament loading during athletic maneuvers remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of hamstring strength on anterior cruciate ligament loading during anticipated sidestep cut. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 351 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 11% |
| Spain | 32 | 9% |
| Canada | 18 | 5% |
| Australia | 16 | 5% |
| Ireland | 14 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 3% |
| Finland | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 117 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 279 | 79% |
| Scientists | 43 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 269 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 21% |
| Unknown | 55 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 90 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 12% |
| Engineering | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#148,734
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#4
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,149
of 243,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.