↓ Skip to main content

Mangrove Species Identification: Comparing WorldView-2 with Aerial Photographs

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mangrove Species Identification: Comparing WorldView-2 with Aerial Photographs
Published in
Remote Sensing, June 2014
DOI 10.3390/rs6076064
Authors

Muditha K. Heenkenda, Karen E. Joyce, Stefan W. Maier, Renee Bartolo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 217 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Lecturer 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 68 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 12%
Engineering 14 6%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,870,267
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#934
of 11,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,925
of 227,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#7
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.