↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical signatures of copper redistribution in IOCG-type mineralisation, Gawler Craton, South Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Mineralium Deposita, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Geochemical signatures of copper redistribution in IOCG-type mineralisation, Gawler Craton, South Australia
Published in
Mineralium Deposita, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00126-017-0749-1
Authors

Yulia A. Uvarova, Mark A. Pearce, Weihua Liu, James S. Cleverley, Robert M. Hough

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 6 30%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 70%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,478,452
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Mineralium Deposita
#150
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,072
of 312,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralium Deposita
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.