| Title |
Dietary intake of acrylamide and esophageal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-014-0359-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leila Lujan-Barroso, Carlos Alberto González, Nadia Slimani, Mireia Obón-Santacana, Pietro Ferrari, Heinz Freisling, Kim Overvad, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Antoine Racine, Verena Katzke, Tilman Kühn, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, J. Ramón Quirós, Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo, Pilar Amiano, Carmen Navarro, Aurelio Barricarte, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Ruth C. Travis, Antonia Trichopoulou, Christina Bamia, Vassiliki Benetou, Calogero Saieva, Sara Grioni, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Amalia Mattiello, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Peter D. Siersema, Mattijs E. Numans, Petra H. Peeters, Ulrika Ericson, Elisabet Wirfält, Malin Sund, Mattias Johansson, Elisabete Weiderpass, Guri Skeie, Elio Riboli, Heiner Boeing, Eric J. Duell |
| Abstract |
The relation between dietary acrylamide intake and esophageal cancer (EC) risk, including esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), has not been consistent. We evaluated the association between dietary acrylamide intake and EAC, ESCC, and overall EC in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 56% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,947,191
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#447
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,415
of 226,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.