You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Short‐term complications and long‐term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/bjs.9552 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R E Andersson |
Abstract |
Laparoscopic appendicectomy has been proposed as the standard for surgical treatment of acute appendicitis, based on controversial evidence. This study compared outcomes after open and laparoscopic appendicectomy in a national, population-based cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,782,648
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#4,071
of 5,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,571
of 226,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.