↓ Skip to main content

Development of a tool to aid the radiologic technologist using augmented reality and computer vision

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Development of a tool to aid the radiologic technologist using augmented reality and computer vision
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00247-017-3968-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert D. MacDougall, Benoit Scherrer, Steven Don

Abstract

This technical innovation describes the development of a novel device to aid technologists in reducing exposure variation and repeat imaging in computed and digital radiography. The device consists of a color video and depth camera in combination with proprietary software and user interface. A monitor in the x-ray control room displays the position of the patient in real time with respect to automatic exposure control chambers and image receptor area. The thickness of the body part of interest is automatically displayed along with a motion indicator for the examined body part. The aim is to provide an automatic measurement of patient thickness to set the x-ray technique and to assist the technologist in detecting errors in positioning and motion before the patient is exposed. The device has the potential to reduce the incidence of repeat imaging by addressing problems technologists encounter daily during the acquisition of radiographs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Computer Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Design 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,848,974
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#142
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,850
of 316,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.