You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/database/bau061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conrad L Schoch, Barbara Robbertse, Vincent Robert, Duong Vu, Gianluigi Cardinali, Laszlo Irinyi, Wieland Meyer, R Henrik Nilsson, Karen Hughes, Andrew N Miller, Paul M Kirk, Kessy Abarenkov, M Catherine Aime, Hiran A Ariyawansa, Martin Bidartondo, Teun Boekhout, Bart Buyck, Qing Cai, Jie Chen, Ana Crespo, Pedro W Crous, Ulrike Damm, Z Wilhelm De Beer, Bryn T M Dentinger, Pradeep K Divakar, Margarita Dueñas, Nicolas Feau, Katerina Fliegerova, Miguel A García, Zai-Wei Ge, Gareth W Griffith, Johannes Z Groenewald, Marizeth Groenewald, Martin Grube, Marieka Gryzenhout, Cécile Gueidan, Liangdong Guo, Sarah Hambleton, Richard Hamelin, Karen Hansen, Valérie Hofstetter, Seung-Beom Hong, Jos Houbraken, Kevin D Hyde, Patrik Inderbitzin, Peter R Johnston, Samantha C Karunarathna, Urmas Kõljalg, Gábor M Kovács, Ekaphan Kraichak, Krisztina Krizsan, Cletus P Kurtzman, Karl-Henrik Larsson, Steven Leavitt, Peter M Letcher, Kare Liimatainen, Jian-Kui Liu, D Jean Lodge, Janet Jennifer Luangsa-ard, H Thorsten Lumbsch, Sajeewa S N Maharachchikumbura, Dimuthu Manamgoda, María P Martín, Andrew M Minnis, Jean-Marc Moncalvo, Giuseppina Mulè, Karen K Nakasone, Tuula Niskanen, Ibai Olariaga, Tamás Papp, Tamás Petkovits, Raquel Pino-Bodas, Martha J Powell, Huzefa A Raja, Dirk Redecker, J M Sarmiento-Ramirez, Keith A Seifert, Bhushan Shrestha, Soili Stenroos, Benjamin Stielow, Sung-Oui Suh, Kazuaki Tanaka, Leho Tedersoo, M Teresa Telleria, Dhanushka Udayanga, Wendy A Untereiner, Javier Diéguez Uribeondo, Krishna V Subbarao, Csaba Vágvölgyi, Cobus Visagie, Kerstin Voigt, Donald M Walker, Bevan S Weir, Michael Weiß, Nalin N Wijayawardene, Michael J Wingfield, J P Xu, Zhu L Yang, Ning Zhang, Wen-Ying Zhuang, Scott Federhen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 420 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 106 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 213 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Unknown | 92 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,111,518
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#21
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,608
of 242,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.