↓ Skip to main content

Serious spontaneous epistaxis and hypertension in hospitalized patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Serious spontaneous epistaxis and hypertension in hospitalized patients
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00405-011-1659-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Page, Aurélie Biet, Sophie Liabeuf, Vladimir Strunski, Albert Fournier

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of hypertension in patients hospitalized for serious spontaneous epistaxis. This 6-year retrospective study was based on 219 patients hospitalized in a University Hospital ENT and Head and Neck surgery department for serious spontaneous epistaxis. The following parameters were recorded: length of hospital stay, history of hypertension, blood pressure (BP) recordings (on admission, during hospitalization and on discharge), epistaxis severity criteria, including medical and/or surgical management of epistaxis (blood transfusion depending on blood count, embolization, surgery), medications affecting clotting. Epistaxis was classified into two groups: serious and severe. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, sex ratio, history of epistaxis and BP characteristics including history of hypertension, mean BP on admission, mean arterial pressure on discharge and number of patients in whom BP was difficult to control. Patients with more severe epistaxis had a similar exposure to anticoagulant and platelet antiaggregant medications as patients with less severe epistaxis. Overall, on univariate logistic regression analysis, no factors were independently associated with severity of epistaxis. The pathophysiology of serious spontaneous epistaxis remains to be unclear. It concerns elderly patients (>60-70 years old) with a history of hypertension in about 50% of cases. Serious spontaneous epistaxis may also be the presenting sign of underlying true hypertension in about 43% of patients with no history of hypertension. However, hypertension per se does not appear to be a statistically significant causal factor and/or a factor of severity of serious spontaneous epistaxis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,686,652
of 24,225,722 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#100
of 3,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,419
of 115,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,225,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.