You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Overlooked Terrestrial Impacts of Mountaintop Mining
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1525/bio.2013.63.5.7 |
| Authors |
James Wickham, Petra Bohall Wood, Matthew C. Nicholson, William Jenkins, Daniel Druckenbrod, Glenn W. Suter, Michael P. Strager, Christine Mazzarella, Walter Galloway, John Amos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,190,121
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#444
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,146
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.