↓ Skip to main content

How do guide dogs of blind owners and pet dogs of sighted owners (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for food?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
How do guide dogs of blind owners and pet dogs of sighted owners (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for food?
Published in
Animal Cognition, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-008-0138-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Gaunet

Abstract

Although there are some indications that dogs (Canis familiaris) use the eyes of humans as a cue during human-dog interactions, the exact conditions under which this holds true are unclear. Analysing whether the interactive modalities of guide dogs and pet dogs differ when they interact with their blind, and sighted owners, respectively, is one way to tackle this problem; more specifically, it allows examining the effect of the visual status of the owner. The interactive behaviours of dogs were recorded when the dogs were prevented from accessing food that they had previously learned to access. A novel audible behaviour was observed: dogs licked their mouths sonorously. Data analyses showed that the guide dogs performed this behaviour longer and more frequently than the pet dogs; seven of the nine guide dogs and two of the nine pet dogs displayed this behaviour. However, gazing at the container where the food was and gazing at the owner (with or without sonorous mouth licking), gaze alternation between the container and the owner, vocalisation and contact with the owner did not differ between groups. Together, the results suggest that there is no overall distinction between guide and pet dogs in exploratory, learning and motivational behaviours and in their understanding of their owner's attentional state, i.e. guide dogs do not understand that their owner cannot see (them). However, results show that guide dogs are subject to incidental learning and suggest that they supplemented their way to trigger their owners' attention with a new distal cue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 36%
Psychology 26 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 10%
Philosophy 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,779,141
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#638
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,745
of 80,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.