| Title |
Genomes or exomes: evaluation of cost, time and coverage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2011-12-s1-p43 |
| Authors |
Sumit Middha, Jeanne L Theis, Adele H Goodloe, Timothy M Olson, Jean-Pierre A Kocher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 67% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 67% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,158
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,871
of 141,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.