↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing taxonomic resolution and sampling effort to design cost‐effective ecological models for environmental assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing taxonomic resolution and sampling effort to design cost‐effective ecological models for environmental assessment
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12312
Authors

Joseph R. Bennett, Danielle R. Sisson, John P. Smol, Brian F. Cumming, Hugh P. Possingham, Yvonne M. Buckley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 80 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 51%
Environmental Science 27 28%
Computer Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,302,655
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,419
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,280
of 233,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#23
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.