↓ Skip to main content

Using assisted colonisation to conserve biodiversity and restore ecosystem function under climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using assisted colonisation to conserve biodiversity and restore ecosystem function under climate change
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.034
Authors

Ian D. Lunt, Margaret Byrne, Jessica J. Hellmann, Nicola J. Mitchell, Stephen T. Garnett, Matt W. Hayward, Tara G. Martin, Eve McDonald-Maddden, Stephen E. Williams, Kerstin K. Zander

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Australia 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 372 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 18%
Researcher 71 18%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Other 16 4%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 68 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 37%
Environmental Science 133 33%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 76 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,566,364
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,311
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,740
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#15
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.