Title |
Neanderthal Use of Callista chione Shells as Raw Material for Retouched Tools in South-east Italy: Analysis of Grotta del Cavallo Layer L Assemblage with a New Methodology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10816-014-9215-x |
Authors |
Francesca Romagnoli, Fabio Martini, Lucia Sarti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Professor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 29 | 42% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#19,400,321
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#309
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,224
of 231,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them