↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Preemptive Oral Oxycodone with Morphine Patient-Controlled Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Uterine Artery…

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Preemptive Oral Oxycodone with Morphine Patient-Controlled Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00270-014-0913-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex H. Konstantatos, Helen Kavnoudias, James R. Stegeman, Dana Boyd, Maryann Street, Michael Bailey, Stuart M. Lyon, Kenneth R. Thomson

Abstract

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of oral premedication of oxycodone in a group of patients undergoing elective uterine artery embolization under sedation for fibroid disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,653,743
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#177
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,309
of 228,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.