You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
When Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice, the Measure Matters: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JCO Oncology Practice, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1200/jop.2014.001413 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claire F Snyder, Joseph M Herman, Sharon M White, Brandon S Luber, Amanda L Blackford, Michael A Carducci, Albert W Wu |
Abstract |
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly being used in clinical practice to inform individual patient management, but evidence is needed on which PROs are best suited for clinical use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 45% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 19% |
Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 25% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,334,428
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from JCO Oncology Practice
#1,477
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,454
of 243,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCO Oncology Practice
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.