↓ Skip to main content

When Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice, the Measure Matters: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JCO Oncology Practice, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice, the Measure Matters: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JCO Oncology Practice, July 2014
DOI 10.1200/jop.2014.001413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire F Snyder, Joseph M Herman, Sharon M White, Brandon S Luber, Amanda L Blackford, Michael A Carducci, Albert W Wu

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly being used in clinical practice to inform individual patient management, but evidence is needed on which PROs are best suited for clinical use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 11 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,280,788
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from JCO Oncology Practice
#1,468
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,265
of 242,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCO Oncology Practice
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.