↓ Skip to main content

Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
885 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1331 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA
Published in
Nature, July 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13408
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Huerta-Sánchez, Xin Jin, Asan, Zhuoma Bianba, Benjamin M. Peter, Nicolas Vinckenbosch, Yu Liang, Xin Yi, Mingze He, Mehmet Somel, Peixiang Ni, Bo Wang, Xiaohua Ou, Huasang, Jiangbai Luosang, Zha Xi Ping Cuo, Kui Li, Guoyi Gao, Ye Yin, Wei Wang, Xiuqing Zhang, Xun Xu, Huanming Yang, Yingrui Li, Jian Wang, Jun Wang, Rasmus Nielsen

Abstract

As modern humans migrated out of Africa, they encountered many new environmental conditions, including greater temperature extremes, different pathogens and higher altitudes. These diverse environments are likely to have acted as agents of natural selection and to have led to local adaptations. One of the most celebrated examples in humans is the adaptation of Tibetans to the hypoxic environment of the high-altitude Tibetan plateau. A hypoxia pathway gene, EPAS1, was previously identified as having the most extreme signature of positive selection in Tibetans, and was shown to be associated with differences in haemoglobin concentration at high altitude. Re-sequencing the region around EPAS1 in 40 Tibetan and 40 Han individuals, we find that this gene has a highly unusual haplotype structure that can only be convincingly explained by introgression of DNA from Denisovan or Denisovan-related individuals into humans. Scanning a larger set of worldwide populations, we find that the selected haplotype is only found in Denisovans and in Tibetans, and at very low frequency among Han Chinese. Furthermore, the length of the haplotype, and the fact that it is not found in any other populations, makes it unlikely that the haplotype sharing between Tibetans and Denisovans was caused by incomplete ancestral lineage sorting rather than introgression. Our findings illustrate that admixture with other hominin species has provided genetic variation that helped humans to adapt to new environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 14 1%
Unknown 1265 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 310 23%
Student > Bachelor 213 16%
Researcher 180 14%
Student > Master 132 10%
Other 61 5%
Other 233 18%
Unknown 202 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 530 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 294 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 3%
Social Sciences 40 3%
Arts and Humanities 34 3%
Other 152 11%
Unknown 239 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1049. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,270
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,546
of 98,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70
of 242,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#6
of 978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.