You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1102999108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier A. Bravo, Paul Forsythe, Marianne V. Chew, Emily Escaravage, Hélène M. Savignac, Timothy G. Dinan, John Bienenstock, John F. Cryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 419 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 86 | 21% |
| United States | 61 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 3% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Unknown | 203 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 351 | 84% |
| Scientists | 31 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Hungary | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3752 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 731 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 534 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 519 | 13% |
| Researcher | 446 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 177 | 5% |
| Other | 595 | 15% |
| Unknown | 848 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 825 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 455 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 442 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 342 | 9% |
| Psychology | 151 | 4% |
| Other | 667 | 17% |
| Unknown | 968 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1020. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,973
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#508
of 103,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 135,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.