↓ Skip to main content

Mapping deforestation and urban expansion in Freetown, Sierra Leone, from pre- to post-war economic recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Mapping deforestation and urban expansion in Freetown, Sierra Leone, from pre- to post-war economic recovery
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10661-016-5469-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lamin R. Mansaray, Jingfeng Huang, Alimamy A. Kamara

Abstract

Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone has experienced vast land-cover changes over the past three decades. In Sierra Leone, however, availability of updated land-cover data is still a problem even for environmental managers. This study was therefore, conducted to provide up-to-date land-cover data for Freetown. Multi-temporal Landsat data at 1986, 2001, and 2015 were obtained, and a maximum likelihood supervised classification was employed. Eight land-cover classes or categories were recognized as follows: water, wetland, built-up, dense forest, sparse forest, grassland, barren, and mangrove. Land-cover changes were mapped via post-classification change detection. The persistence, gain, and loss of each land-cover class, and selected land conversions were also quantified. An overall classification accuracy of 87.3 % and a Kappa statistic of 0.85 were obtained for the 2015 map. From 1986 to 2015, water, built-up, grassland, and barren had net gains, whereas forests, wetlands, and mangrove had net loses. Conversion analyses among forests, grassland, and built-up show that built-up had targeted grassland and avoided forests. This study also revealed that, the overall land-cover change at 2001-2015 was higher (28.5 %) than that recorded at 1986-2001 (20.9 %). This is attributable to the population increase in Freetown and the high economic growth and infrastructural development recorded countrywide after the civil war. In view of the rapid land-cover change and its associated environmental impacts, this study recommends the enactment of policies that would strike a balance between urbanization and environmental sustainability in Freetown.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 21%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,372,295
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#52
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,541
of 360,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.