Title |
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Obesity Surgery, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11695-011-0501-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus Berende, Jean-Paul de Zoete, Johannes Franciscus Smulders, Simon Willem Nienhuijs |
Abstract |
Bariatric revision surgery is associated with several complications that can be attributed to decreased quality of tissue and complexity of the surgery. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a simple technique with potential advantages. Therefore, the results of this procedure were evaluated as a revisional option. Fifty-one patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Indications for the LSG were insufficient weight loss (34 patients, group 1) or vomiting (17 patients, group 2) following a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Patient and procedure characteristics as well as outcome were collected prospectively. From October 2006 to June 2010, 51 patients with a failed prior bariatic procedure (VBG or LAGB) were converted to (L)SG. The conversion rate was zero. The median procedure time was 99 min (range 54-221) and hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-38). There was no mortality after 30 days. Complications included bleeding (six) and leakage of the staple line (seven). Mean follow-up was 13.8 (2-46) months. LSG as revision surgery for insufficient weight loss resulted in extra weight loss of 52.7%, and the overall extra weight loss was 49.3%. When LSG was performed because of vomiting, 82% was able to eat solid food at follow-up. Of the 65 pre-existent co-morbidities, 21 were resolved and 18 improved. LSG as a revision procedure is feasible. An additional weight loss and further resolution of co-morbidity seem achievable, however, at the cost of a high number of complications. Therefore, revision bariatric surgery should be limited to expert tertiary bariatric centers. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Other | 23 | 24% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 25% |