↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11695-011-0501-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus Berende, Jean-Paul de Zoete, Johannes Franciscus Smulders, Simon Willem Nienhuijs

Abstract

Bariatric revision surgery is associated with several complications that can be attributed to decreased quality of tissue and complexity of the surgery. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a simple technique with potential advantages. Therefore, the results of this procedure were evaluated as a revisional option. Fifty-one patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Indications for the LSG were insufficient weight loss (34 patients, group 1) or vomiting (17 patients, group 2) following a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Patient and procedure characteristics as well as outcome were collected prospectively. From October 2006 to June 2010, 51 patients with a failed prior bariatic procedure (VBG or LAGB) were converted to (L)SG. The conversion rate was zero. The median procedure time was 99 min (range 54-221) and hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-38). There was no mortality after 30 days. Complications included bleeding (six) and leakage of the staple line (seven). Mean follow-up was 13.8 (2-46) months. LSG as revision surgery for insufficient weight loss resulted in extra weight loss of 52.7%, and the overall extra weight loss was 49.3%. When LSG was performed because of vomiting, 82% was able to eat solid food at follow-up. Of the 65 pre-existent co-morbidities, 21 were resolved and 18 improved. LSG as a revision procedure is feasible. An additional weight loss and further resolution of co-morbidity seem achievable, however, at the cost of a high number of complications. Therefore, revision bariatric surgery should be limited to expert tertiary bariatric centers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 24 25%