| Title |
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review, May 1935
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrev.47.777 |
| Authors |
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 196 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 11% |
| Japan | 19 | 10% |
| United States | 15 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 101 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 155 | 79% |
| Scientists | 39 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 1% |
| Germany | 36 | 1% |
| France | 17 | <1% |
| Spain | 14 | <1% |
| Canada | 14 | <1% |
| Japan | 11 | <1% |
| Brazil | 11 | <1% |
| Australia | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 95 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2869 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 841 | 27% |
| Researcher | 514 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 412 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 344 | 11% |
| Professor | 155 | 5% |
| Other | 499 | 16% |
| Unknown | 400 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 1923 | 61% |
| Engineering | 147 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 131 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 107 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 63 | 2% |
| Other | 341 | 11% |
| Unknown | 453 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#22,872
of 25,978,998 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review
#1
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,978,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.