You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TREM2 mutations implicated in neurodegeneration impair cell surface transport and phagocytosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gernot Kleinberger, Yoshinori Yamanishi, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Eva Czirr, Ebba Lohmann, Elise Cuyvers, Hanne Struyfs, Nadine Pettkus, Andrea Wenninger-Weinzierl, Fargol Mazaheri, Sabina Tahirovic, Alberto Lleó, Daniel Alcolea, Juan Fortea, Michael Willem, Sven Lammich, José L Molinuevo, Raquel Sánchez-Valle, Anna Antonell, Alfredo Ramirez, Michael T Heneka, Kristel Sleegers, Julie van der Zee, Jean-Jacques Martin, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede, Henrik Zetterberg, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Hakan Gurvit, Tony Wyss-Coray, John Hardy, Marco Colonna, Christian Haass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 681 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 145 | 21% |
| Researcher | 127 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 98 | 14% |
| Unknown | 152 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 155 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 86 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 9% |
| Unknown | 163 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#448,429
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#1,205
of 5,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,823
of 246,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#13
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.