↓ Skip to main content

Protein expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 in primary cutaneous melanoma—biomarkers of potential utility?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Pathology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 in primary cutaneous melanoma—biomarkers of potential utility?
Published in
Human Pathology, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendon Mitchell, Dominick Leone, Kyle Feller, Sandeep Menon, Philip Bondzie, Shi Yang, Hee-Young Park, Meera Mahalingam

Abstract

Dysregulation of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis, relevant in melanoma progression, activates cell cycle progression and migration via stimulation of the MAPK pathway. We sought to ascertain the cooperativity of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis with established prognosticators and BRAF status in melanoma. Samples (n = 107) of primary cutaneous melanoma were assessed for protein expression of CXCR4 and CXCL12, and molecular analyses were performed to ascertain BRAF status. Univariate analyses of CXCR4 protein showed that the proportion of CXCR4 positives was greater in melanomas with absence of mitoses (P < .0001), absence of ulceration (P = .0008), and absence of regression (P = .02). Patients presenting at shallower stages (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] 1-2) exhibited a larger proportion of CXCR4 positives (76.9%, P < .0001 and 69.0%, P = .008), whereas those at deeper stages (AJCC 3-4) exhibited a larger proportion of negatives (75.0%, P = .004 and 66.7%, P = .22). In a multivariate analysis, lower odds of CXCR4 protein expression were associated with AJCC stage 3 (odds ratio [OR]=0.16, P = .01), AJCC stage 4 (OR=0.17, P = .04), and mitoses (OR=0.21, P = .01). Univariate analyses of CXCL12 protein showed that the proportion of CXCL12 negatives was significantly smaller in melanomas with depth of at least 1 mm, absence of ulceration, and absence of vascular invasion (P < .0001 for all). CXCR4 and CXCL12 appear to be biomarkers associated with established prognosticators of good and poor clinical outcome, respectively, in primary cutaneous melanoma. A BRAF mutation does not appear to be associated with CXCR4/CXCL12 axis upregulation in primary cutaneous melanoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#2,327
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,637
of 242,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.