↓ Skip to main content

Exploring mortality among drug treatment clients: The relationship between treatment type and mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring mortality among drug treatment clients: The relationship between treatment type and mortality
Published in
Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Belinda Lloyd, Renee Zahnow, Monica J. Barratt, David Best, Dan I. Lubman, Jason Ferris

Abstract

Studies consistently identify substance treatment populations as more likely to die prematurely compared with age-matched general population, with mortality risk higher out-of-treatment than in-treatment. While opioid-using pharmacotherapy cohorts have been studied extensively, less evidence exists regarding effects of other treatment types, and clients in treatment for other drugs. This paper examines mortality during and following treatment across treatment modalities. A retrospective seven-year cohort was utilised to examine mortality during and in the two years following treatment among clients from Victoria, Australia, recorded on the Alcohol and Drug Information Service database by linking with National Death Index. 18,686 clients over a 12-month period were included. Crude (CMRs) and standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were analysed in terms of treatment modality, and time in or out of treatment. Higher risk of premature death was associated with residential withdrawal as the last type of treatment engagement, while mortality following counselling was significantly lower than all other treatment types in the year post-treatment. Both CMRs and SMRs were significantly higher in-treatment than post-treatment. Better understanding of factors contributing to elevated mortality risk for clients engaged in, and following treatment, is needed to ensure that treatment systems provide optimal outcomes during and after treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Design 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%