↓ Skip to main content

Uganda's HIV Prevention Success: The Role of Sexual Behavior Change and the National Response

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
Title
Uganda's HIV Prevention Success: The Role of Sexual Behavior Change and the National Response
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10461-006-9073-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Green, Daniel T. Halperin, Vinand Nantulya, Janice A. Hogle

Abstract

There has been considerable interest in understanding what may have led to Uganda's dramatic decline in HIV prevalence, one of the world's earliest and most compelling AIDS prevention successes. Survey and other data suggest that a decline in multi-partner sexual behavior is the behavioral change most likely associated with HIV decline. It appears that behavior change programs, particularly involving extensive promotion of "zero grazing" (faithfulness and partner reduction), largely developed by the Ugandan government and local NGOs including faith-based, women's, people-living-with-AIDS and other community-based groups, contributed to the early declines in casual/multiple sexual partnerships and HIV incidence and, along with other factors including condom use, to the subsequent sharp decline in HIV prevalence. Yet the debate over "what happened in Uganda" continues, often involving divisive abstinence-versus-condoms rhetoric, which appears more related to the culture wars in the USA than to African social reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 387 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 23%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 87 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 24%
Social Sciences 63 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 97 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#593,270
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#52
of 3,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#798
of 84,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.