| Title |
The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hung-Jen Tang, Hsin-Lan Lin, Yu-Hsiu Lin, Pak-On Leung, Yin-Ching Chuang, Chih-Cheng Lai |
| Abstract |
Knowledge about the impact of each central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,766,262
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#849
of 7,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,800
of 227,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#21
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.