↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic utility of gene therapy with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase for patients with high-grade malignant gliomas: a systematic review and meta analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic utility of gene therapy with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase for patients with high-grade malignant gliomas: a systematic review and meta analysis
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11060-014-1444-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Zhao, Jinhui Tian, Lifeng An, Kehu Yang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of adding viral vector-mediated gene therapy with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) to standard treatment, in comparison with standard treatment alone to treat patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs). A literature search of the databases PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedicine was performed to identify eligible studies. Three randomized controlled trials (involving a total of 532 patients) were included in this systematic review. A meta-analysis of included studies demonstrated a significant increase in median survival time (MST) in patients who were treated with HSV-tk gene therapy (mean deviation 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.76, p < 0.0001). The results of pooled analysis for different patient groups show that overall survival (OS) for all HGG patients was improved by adding gene therapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.74-1.13, p = 0.42], while a different result was seen for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients (HR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.80-1.41, p = 0.70). Furthermore, the combined results for tumor progression implied that standard therapy was superior to gene therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.31, p = 0.09]; yet differences in HR and OR between experimental groups and control groups had no statistical significance (p > 0.05). Based on the best available evidence, it appears that adding gene therapy with HSV-tk has some effect in treating HGG patients, especially with respect to MST. However, neither the pooled analysis of OS, nor the combined analysis of tumor progress indicates any significant advantage to adding gene therapy compared with standard treatment alone. More prospective studies are needed to draw solid conclusions about whether gene therapy has significant prognostic advantage.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,406,063
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#804
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,579
of 227,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.