↓ Skip to main content

Causality between credit depth and economic growth: evidence from 24 OECD countries

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Causality between credit depth and economic growth: evidence from 24 OECD countries
Published in
Empirical Economics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00181-016-1142-0
Authors

Mikhail Stolbov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 6 13%
Lecturer 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27 60%
Mathematics 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#585
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,128
of 344,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.