| Title |
Tracking pigeons in a magnetic anomaly and in magnetically “quiet” terrain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00114-011-0802-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingo Schiffner, Patrick Fuhrmann, Roswitha Wiltschko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#562,131
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#76
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,006
of 116,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.