↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Xenon Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery on Postoperative Cardiac Troponin Release

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Xenon Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery on Postoperative Cardiac Troponin Release
Published in
Anesthesiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000001873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Hofland, Alexandre Ouattara, Jean-Luc Fellahi, Matthias Gruenewald, Jean Hazebroucq, Claude Ecoffey, Pierre Joseph, Matthias Heringlake, Annick Steib, Mark Coburn, Julien Amour, Bertrand Rozec, Inge de Liefde, Patrick Meybohm, Benedikt Preckel, Jean-Luc Hanouz, Luigi Tritapepe, Peter Tonner, Hamina Benhaoua, Jan Patrick Roesner, Berthold Bein, Luc Hanouz, Rob Tenbrinck, Ad J J C Bogers, Bert G Mik, Alain Coiffic, Jochen Renner, Markus Steinfath, Helga Francksen, Ole Broch, Assad Haneya, Manuella Schaller, Patrick Guinet, Lauren Daviet, Corinne Brianchon, Sebastien Rosier, Jean-Jacques Lehot, Hauke Paarmann, Julika Schön, Thorsten Hanke, Joachym Ettel, Silke Olsson, Stefan Klotz, Amir Samet, Giedrius Laurinenas, Adrien Thibaud, Mircea Cristinar, Olivier Collanges, François Levy, Rolf Rossaint, Ana Stevanovic, Gereon Schaelte, Christian Stoppe, Nora Ait Hamou, Sarah Hariri, Astrid Quessard, Aude Carillion, Hélène Morin, Jacqueline Silleran, David Robert, Anne-Sophie Crouzet, Kai Zacharowski, Christian Reyher, Sonja Iken, Nina C Weber, Marcus Hollmann, Susanne Eberl, Giovanni Carriero, Daria Collacchi, Alessandra Di Persio, Olivier Fourcade, Stefan Bergt, Angela Alms

Abstract

Ischemic myocardial damage accompanying coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a clinical challenge. We investigated whether xenon anesthesia could limit myocardial damage in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients, as has been reported for animal ischemia models. In 17 university hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands, low-risk elective, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients were randomized to receive xenon, sevoflurane, or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for anesthesia maintenance. The primary outcome was the cardiac troponin I concentration in the blood 24 h postsurgery. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between the xenon and sevoflurane groups was less than 0.15 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes were the safety and feasibility of xenon anesthesia. The first patient included at each center received xenon anesthesia for practical reasons. For all other patients, anesthesia maintenance was randomized (intention-to-treat: n = 492; per-protocol/without major protocol deviation: n = 446). Median 24-h postoperative cardiac troponin I concentrations (ng/ml [interquartile range]) were 1.14 [0.76 to 2.10] with xenon, 1.30 [0.78 to 2.67] with sevoflurane, and 1.48 [0.94 to 2.78] with total intravenous anesthesia [per-protocol]). The mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between xenon and sevoflurane was -0.09 ng/ml (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.11; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Postoperative cardiac troponin I release was significantly less with xenon than with total intravenous anesthesia (intention-to-treat: P = 0.05; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were comparable across all groups, with no safety concerns. In postoperative cardiac troponin I release, xenon was noninferior to sevoflurane in low-risk, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Only with xenon was cardiac troponin I release less than with total intravenous anesthesia. Xenon anesthesia appeared safe and feasible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,541,990
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#4,673
of 6,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,620
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#41
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.