| Title |
Data sharing between home care professionals: a feasibility study using the RAI Home Care instrument
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn M Guthrie, Robyn Pitman, Paula C Fletcher, John P Hirdes, Paul Stolee, Jeffrey W Poss, Alexandra Papaioannou, Katherine Berg, Helen Janzen Ezekiel |
| Abstract |
Across Ontario, home care professionals collect standardized information on each client using the Resident Assessment for Home Care (RAI-HC). However, this information is not consistently shared with those professionals who provide services in the client's home. In this pilot study, we examined the feasibility of sharing data, from the RAI-HC, between care coordinators and service providers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Finland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,221,142
of 24,490,209 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,140
of 3,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,436
of 231,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,490,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.