↓ Skip to main content

Do Benign Thyroid Nodules Have Malignant Potential? An Evidence‐Based Review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Do Benign Thyroid Nodules Have Malignant Potential? An Evidence‐Based Review
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00268-008-9484-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nimmi Arora, Theresa Scognamiglio, Baixin Zhu, Thomas J. Fahey

Abstract

Benign thyroid tumors account for most nodular thyroid disease. Determination of whether a thyroid nodule is benign or malignant is a major clinical dilemma and underlies the decision to proceed to surgery in many patients. Although the accuracy of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has reduced the need for surgery over the years, questions regarding how to follow FNA-designated benign nodules remain unresolved. This is true at least in part because of uncertainty over whether some benign nodules harbor malignant potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Professor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,982,489
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,084
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,547
of 79,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.