Title |
Predictors of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Korea: a prospective cohort study, 2005-2012
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-360 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongjo Choi, Myungsun Lee, Ray Y Chen, Youngran Kim, Soyoung Yoon, Joon Sung Joh, Seung Kyu Park, Lori E Dodd, Jongseok Lee, Taeksun Song, Ying Cai, Lisa C Goldfeder, Laura E Via, Matthew W Carroll, Clifton E Barry, Sang-Nae Cho |
Abstract |
Tuberculosis remains an important health concern in many countries. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of unfavorable outcomes at the end of treatment (EOT) and at the end of study (EOS; 40 months after EOT) in South Korea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 184 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 13% |
Unknown | 47 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,806,562
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,704
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,789
of 228,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#125
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.