↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Korea: a prospective cohort study, 2005-2012

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Korea: a prospective cohort study, 2005-2012
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongjo Choi, Myungsun Lee, Ray Y Chen, Youngran Kim, Soyoung Yoon, Joon Sung Joh, Seung Kyu Park, Lori E Dodd, Jongseok Lee, Taeksun Song, Ying Cai, Lisa C Goldfeder, Laura E Via, Matthew W Carroll, Clifton E Barry, Sang-Nae Cho

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains an important health concern in many countries. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of unfavorable outcomes at the end of treatment (EOT) and at the end of study (EOS; 40 months after EOT) in South Korea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 47 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,806,562
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,704
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,789
of 228,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#125
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.