↓ Skip to main content

Ecotoxicity and antibiotic resistance of a mixture of hospital and urban sewage in a wastewater treatment plant

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Ecotoxicity and antibiotic resistance of a mixture of hospital and urban sewage in a wastewater treatment plant
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9957-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marine Laquaz, Christophe Dagot, Christine Bazin, Thérèse Bastide, Margaux Gaschet, Marie-Cécile Ploy, Yves Perrodin

Abstract

Hospital and urban effluents are a source of diverse pollutants such as organic compounds, heavy metals, detergents, disinfectants, pharmaceuticals, and microorganisms resistant to antibiotics. Usually, these two types of effluent are mixed in the sewage network, but a pilot site in France now allows studying them separately or mixed to understand more about their characteristics and the phenomena that occur following their mixing. In this study, their ecotoxicity (Daphnia magna mobility, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth, Brachionus calyciflorus reproduction, and SOS Chromotest) and antibiotic resistance (integron quantification) were assessed during mixing and treatment steps. The main results of this study are (i) the ecotoxicity and antibiotic resistance potentials of hospital wastewater are higher than in urban wastewater and (ii) mixing two different effluents does not lead to global synergistic or antagonistic effects on ecotoxicity and antibiotic resistance potential. The global additivity effect observed in this case must be confirmed by other studies on hospital and urban effluents on other sites to improve knowledge relating to this source of pollution and its management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 26%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 38 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,546,919
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#2,878
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,306
of 318,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#56
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.