| Title |
Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrm.2017.71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Fluorescence nanoscopy uniquely combines minimally invasive optical access to the internal nanoscale structure and dynamics of cells and tissues with molecular detection specificity. While the basic physical principles of 'super-resolution' imaging were discovered in the 1990s, with initial experimental demonstrations following in 2000, the broad application of super-resolution imaging to address cell-biological questions has only more recently emerged. Nanoscopy approaches have begun to facilitate discoveries in cell biology and to add new knowledge. One current direction for method improvement is the ambition to quantitatively account for each molecule under investigation and assess true molecular colocalization patterns via multi-colour analyses. In pursuing this goal, the labelling of individual molecules to enable their visualization has emerged as a central challenge. Extending nanoscale imaging into (sliced) tissue and whole-animal contexts is a further goal. In this Review we describe the successes to date and discuss current obstacles and possibilities for further development. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 20% |
| United States | 28 | 17% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| China | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 54% |
| Scientists | 65 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 228 | 20% |
| Researcher | 194 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 4% |
| Other | 157 | 14% |
| Unknown | 287 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 239 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 99 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 99 | 9% |
| Engineering | 60 | 5% |
| Other | 165 | 15% |
| Unknown | 332 | 30% |