↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker for diagnosing infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker for diagnosing infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10067-017-3792-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyoun-Ah Kim, Ju-Yang Jung, Chang-Hee Suh

Abstract

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been investigated as disease activity markers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Hence, we investigated the clinical significance of these parameters in diagnosing infection in patients with SLE. In total, 120 patients with SLE, who were admitted to hospital due to disease flares or infection, were recruited for the study. Of the 120 patients, 60 had a concurrent infection (SLE with infection), while the remaining 60 patients were admitted with a flare without any evidence of infection (SLE with flare). NLR was higher in the patients with SLE with infection, compared to patients with SLE with flare (14.2 ± 15.4 versus 3.3 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). Additionally, PLR was higher in the SLE with infection group than in the SLE with flare group (357.7 ± 350.1 versus 231.7 ± 152.9, p = 0.012), but not MLR. In the SLE with infection group, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels positively correlated with NLR and PLR. NLR with a cut-off value of 5.70 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 indicated good sensitivity (75%) and specificity (90%), for the diagnosis of SLE with infection. CRP with a cut-off value of 1.28 mg/dL (AUC 0.942) showed the sensitivity (93.3%) and specificity (91.7%). NLR with a cut-off value of 5.70 and CRP with a cut-off value of 1.28 mg/dL showed the increased specificity (98.3%) than only CRP, but not significant. NLR could be a good additive marker for diagnosing infection in patients with SLE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,566,634
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#473
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,757
of 325,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.