↓ Skip to main content

Implementing an Evidence-Based Parenting Program in Community Agencies: What Helps and What Gets in the Way?

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Implementing an Evidence-Based Parenting Program in Community Agencies: What Helps and What Gets in the Way?
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10488-011-0371-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Asgary-Eden, Catherine M. Lee

Abstract

Adoption of evidence-based programs for families by community agencies requires an understanding of variables that influence implementation. Managers and service providers from 64 community agencies reported on variables that affected the implementation of Triple P, an evidence-based parenting program. Both types of stakeholders reported adequate office resources; over half the managers and over two-thirds of service providers reported adequate training. Adequate office resources and positive agency characteristics, including organizational climate, were associated with higher program usage. Service providers' reports of the variables impacted their individual adherence rates; managers had broader perspectives of the quality of implementation in their organizations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 9%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 36%
Social Sciences 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,339,754
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#186
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,603
of 135,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them