You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Intra-Articular Infiltrations in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Anitua, Mikel Sánchez, José Javier Aguirre, Roberto Prado, Sabino Padilla, Gorka Orive |
| Abstract |
The goal of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) as a treatment for reducing symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 29% |
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Barbados | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Andorra | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,666,980
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#211
of 4,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,321
of 242,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.