↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of an evidenced based nutrition support pathway for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplant patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of an evidenced based nutrition support pathway for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplant patients
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Andersen, Teresa Brown, Glen Kennedy, Merrilyn Banks

Abstract

The type of nutrition support given during haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) varies greatly between transplant units and often includes enteral nutrition (EN) and/or parenteral nutrition (PN). The aims of this study were to develop an evidenced based nutrition support pathway for HPCT patients and then evaluate changes in nutrition support practices post implementation of the pathway into clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 29%
Other 10 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,896,290
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#1,710
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,845
of 242,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.