| Title |
Geometrical feature analysis and disaster assessment of the Xinmo landslide based on remote sensing data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mountain Science, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11629-017-4633-3 |
| Authors |
Jian-rong Fan, Xi-yu Zhang, Feng-huan Su, Yong-gang Ge, Paolo Tarolli, Zheng-yin Yang, Chao Zeng, Zhen Zeng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,954,297
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#121
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,082
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them