You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association analysis of coffee drinking suggests association with CYP1A1/CYP1A2 and NRCAM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Psychiatry, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/mp.2011.101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N Amin, E Byrne, J Johnson, G Chenevix-Trench, S Walter, I M Nolte, J M Vink, R Rawal, M Mangino, A Teumer, J C Keers, G Verwoert, S Baumeister, R Biffar, A Petersmann, N Dahmen, A Doering, A Isaacs, L Broer, N R Wray, G W Montgomery, D Levy, B M Psaty, V Gudnason, A Chakravarti, P Sulem, D F Gudbjartsson, L A Kiemeney, U Thorsteinsdottir, K Stefansson, F J A van Rooij, Y S Aulchenko, J J Hottenga, F R Rivadeneira, A Hofman, A G Uitterlinden, C J Hammond, S-Y Shin, A Ikram, J C M Witteman, A C J W Janssens, H Snieder, H Tiemeier, B H R Wolfenbuttel, B A Oostra, A C Heath, E Wichmann, T D Spector, H J Grabe, D I Boomsma, N G Martin, C M van Duijn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 36% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#817,180
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#708
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,159
of 136,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.