| Title |
Solving Problems in Social–Ecological Systems: Definition, Practice and Barriers of Transdisciplinary Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Angelstam, Kjell Andersson, Matilda Annerstedt, Robert Axelsson, Marine Elbakidze, Pablo Garrido, Patrik Grahn, K. Ingemar Jönsson, Simen Pedersen, Peter Schlyter, Erik Skärbäck, Mike Smith, Ingrid Stjernquist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 504 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 19% |
| Researcher | 91 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 18% |
| Unknown | 91 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 141 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 84 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 81 | 15% |
| Unknown | 122 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,703
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,130
of 212,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.