↓ Skip to main content

Discovery and Optimization of 5‑Amino-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide Series against Trypanosoma cruzi

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery and Optimization of 5‑Amino-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide Series against Trypanosoma cruzi
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, August 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Brand, Eun Jung Ko, Elisabet Viayna, Stephen Thompson, Daniel Spinks, Michael Thomas, Lars Sandberg, Amanda F. Francisco, Shiromani Jayawardhana, Victoria C. Smith, Chimed Jansen, Manu De Rycker, John Thomas, Lorna MacLean, Maria Osuna-Cabello, Jennifer Riley, Paul Scullion, Laste Stojanovski, Frederick R. C. Simeons, Ola Epemolu, Yoko Shishikura, Sabrinia D. Crouch, Tania S. Bakshi, Christopher J. Nixon, Iain H. Reid, Alan P. Hill, Tim Z. Underwood, Sean J. Hindley, Sharon A. Robinson, John M. Kelly, Jose M. Fiandor, Paul G. Wyatt, Maria Marco, Timothy J. Miles, Kevin D. Read, Ian H. Gilbert

Abstract

Chagas' disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is the most common cause of cardiac-related deaths in endemic regions of Latin America. There is an urgent need for new safer treatments because current standard therapeutic options, benznidazole and nifurtimox, have significant side effects and are only effective in the acute phase of the infection with limited efficacy in the chronic phase. Phenotypic high content screening against the intracellular parasite in infected VERO cells was used to identify a novel hit series of 5-amino-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamides (ATC). Optimization of the ATC series gave improvements in potency, aqueous solubility, and metabolic stability, which combined to give significant improvements in oral exposure. Mitigation of a potential Ames and hERG liability ultimately led to two promising compounds, one of which demonstrated significant suppression of parasite burden in a mouse model of Chagas' disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 25 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,478,452
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#20,564
of 22,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,378
of 316,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#87
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.