↓ Skip to main content

Using light as a lure is an efficient predatory strategy in Arachnocampa flava, an Australian glowworm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Using light as a lure is an efficient predatory strategy in Arachnocampa flava, an Australian glowworm
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00360-010-0533-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robyn E. Willis, Craig R. White, David J. Merritt

Abstract

Trap-building, sit-and-wait predators such as spiders, flies and antlions tend to have low standard metabolic rates (SMRs) but potentially high metabolic costs of trap construction. Members of the genus Arachnocampa (glowworms) use an unusual predatory strategy: larvae bioluminesce to lure positively phototropic insects into their adhesive webs. We investigated the metabolic costs associated with bioluminescence and web maintenance in larval Arachnocampa flava. The mean rate of CO(2) production (VCO(2)) during continuous bioluminescence was 4.38 μl h(-1) ± 0.78 (SEM). The mean VCO(2) of inactive, non-bioluminescing larvae was 3.49 ± 0.35 μl h(-1). The mean VCO(2) during web maintenance when not bioluminescencing was 8.95 ± 1.78 μl h(-1), a value significantly lower than that measured during trap construction by other predatory arthropods. These results indicate that bioluminescence itself is not energetically expensive, in accordance with our prediction that a high cost of bioluminescence would render the Arachnocampa sit-and-lure predatory strategy inefficient. In laboratory experiments, both elevated feeding rates and daily web removal caused an increase in bioluminescent output. Thus, larvae increase their investment in light output when food is plentiful or when stressed through having to rebuild their webs. As light production is efficient and the cost of web maintenance is relatively low, the energetic returns associated with continuing to glow may outweigh the costs of continuing to attract prey.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 60%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2011.
All research outputs
#3,234,181
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#57
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,093
of 188,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.