↓ Skip to main content

Twelve myths about shared decision making

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 4,167)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
167 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
307 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twelve myths about shared decision making
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Légaré, Philippe Thompson-Leduc

Abstract

As shared decision makes increasing headway in healthcare policy, it is under more scrutiny. We sought to identify and dispel the most prevalent myths about shared decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 540 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 16%
Researcher 72 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 12%
Other 43 8%
Student > Bachelor 41 7%
Other 137 25%
Unknown 104 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 16%
Psychology 40 7%
Social Sciences 38 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 3%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 142 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#331,910
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#19
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,746
of 242,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.