↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Minority Stress, Coping, and Physical Health Indicators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Minority Stress, Coping, and Physical Health Indicators
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10880-017-9504-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delphia J. Flenar, Carolyn M. Tucker, Jaime L. Williams

Abstract

Sexual minorities experience higher rates of several physical health problems compared to their heterosexual counterparts. The present study uses Meyer's Minority Stress Model (Psychological Bulletin, 129(5): 674-697, 2003) to examine physical health indicators among 250 adults who identified as sexual minorities. Study hypotheses include that sexual minority stress is predictive of two physical health indicators (i.e., engagement in a health-promoting lifestyle and number of physical health problems) and that planning (i.e., problem-focused) and social support coping will partially mediate the relationship between sexual minority stress and each physical health indicator. Results showed that as level of sexual minority stress increased, engagement in a health-promoting lifestyle decreased and the number of physical health problems increased. Planning and social support coping did not mediate these relationships; however, as levels of coping increased, engagement in a health-promoting lifestyle increased. These findings have implications for researchers and healthcare professionals in their efforts to promote the physical health of sexual minorities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 17 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 22%
Unspecified 17 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,914,959
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#359
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,832
of 316,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.