↓ Skip to main content

Dominant Mutations in GRM1 Cause Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 44

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dominant Mutations in GRM1 Cause Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 44
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.08.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren M. Watson, Elizabeth Bamber, Ricardo Parolin Schnekenberg, Jonathan Williams, Conceição Bettencourt, Jennifer Lickiss, Sandeep Jayawant, Katherine Fawcett, Samuel Clokie, Yvonne Wallis, Penny Clouston, David Sims, Henry Houlden, Esther B.E. Becker, Andrea H. Németh

Abstract

The metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) is abundantly expressed in the mammalian central nervous system, where it regulates intracellular calcium homeostasis in response to excitatory signaling. Here, we describe heterozygous dominant mutations in GRM1, which encodes mGluR1, that are associated with distinct disease phenotypes: gain-of-function missense mutations, linked in two different families to adult-onset cerebellar ataxia, and a de novo truncation mutation resulting in a dominant-negative effect that is associated with juvenile-onset ataxia and intellectual disability. Crucially, the gain-of-function mutations could be pharmacologically modulated in vitro using an existing FDA-approved drug, Nitazoxanide, suggesting a possible avenue for treatment, which is currently unavailable for ataxias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,696,947
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,447
of 5,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,721
of 323,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.