↓ Skip to main content

Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. A phenomenographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. A phenomenographic study
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/jocn.12654
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-115549
Authors

Ulla Edéll‐Gustafsson, Charlotte Angelhoff, Ewa Johnsson, Jenny Karlsson, Evalotte Mörelius

Abstract

To explore and describe how parents of preterm and/or sick infants in neonatal care perceive their sleep.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 58 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Psychology 24 13%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,164,372
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#1,404
of 5,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,616
of 230,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.